Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 07:21:35 11/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2003 at 10:16:34, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 29, 2003 at 09:49:55, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On November 29, 2003 at 09:34:02, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >> >>>On November 29, 2003 at 08:26:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>What happened to those 500 CPU? >>> >>>It happened this: >>> >>> >>>[Event "?"] >>>[Site "?"] >>>[Date "2003.11.29"] >>>[Round "?"] >>>[White "Junior"] >>>[Black "Diep"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>>[ECO "B90"] >>>[Annotator "Junior Team"] >>>[PlyCount "197"] >>> >>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 e5 7. Nb3 Be6 8. f3 >>>Nbd7 9. Qd2 b5 10. O-O-O Nb6 11. Qf2 Nc4 12. Bxc4 bxc4 13. Nc5 Qc7 14. Nxe6 >>>fxe6 15. g4 Be7 16. g5 Nh5 17. Qh4 g6 18. Qg4 Qc8 19. Rhf1 Rb8 20. f4 Nxf4 21. >>>h4 Nh5 22. Na4 Ng7 23. Qe2 Qc6 24. Nc3 Rf8 25. Ba7 Rb7 26. Rxf8+ Bxf8 27. Rf1 >>>Nh5 28. Qf3 Nf4 29. Be3 Rf7 30. Qh1 Qc7 31. Qg1 Bg7 32. Rd1 Ke7 33. Bb6 Qb7 34. >>>Ba5 Bf8 35. a3 Ke8 36. Qe3 h6 37. gxh6 Bxh6 38. Kb1 Bf8 39. Bb4 Qc6 40. Qg1 Rb7 >>>41. Qg3 Rh7 42. Qe3 Qc7 43. Ne2 Rxh4 44. Nxf4 exf4 45. Qg1 Kf7 46. e5 d5 47. >>>Bxf8 Kxf8 48. Qxg6 Qxe5 49. Rg1 Ke7 50. Qg8 Qh8 51. Rg7+ Kd6 52. Qf7 Qd8 53. >>>Ka2 a5 54. a4 c3 55. b3 d4 56. Qa7 f3 57. Qa6+ Ke5 58. Qb5+ Ke4 59. Qd3+ Ke5 >>>60. Qxf3 Rf4 61. Qe2+ Kf6 62. Qg2 Ke5 63. Rb7 Qh4 64. Rb5+ Kf6 65. Qg8 Qg4 66. >>>Qd8+ Kg6 67. Rxa5 Rf5 68. Qg8+ Kh5 69. Qh8+ Kg5 70. Ra8 Qd1 71. Qh2 Kf6 72. >>>Qh4+ Rg5 73. Qh6+ Kf5 74. Rf8+ Kg4 75. Qxe6+ Kg3 76. Qd6+ Kg2 77. Qf4 Qh5 78. >>>Qe4+ Kg1 79. Qxd4+ Kh2 80. Rf2+ Rg2 81. Qf4+ Kh1 82. Rf1+ Rg1 83. Qe4+ Kh2 84. >>>Rf2+ Kh3 85. Qd3+ Rg3 86. Qf1+ Kg4 87. Qe2+ Kg5 88. Qe5+ Kh6 89. Qxg3 Qg5 90. >>>Qh3+ Qh5 91. Qe6+ Qg6 92. Rh2+ Kg7 93. Qe7+ Kg8 94. Rf2 Qg7 95. Qe8+ Qf8 96. >>>Rg2+ Kh7 97. Qh5+ Qh6 98. Qf7+ Kh8 99. Rg8# 1-0 >>> >>> >>>Move to avoid 36. ... h6? >>> >>>[D]4kb2/1q3r1p/p2pp1p1/B3p1P1/2p1Pn1P/P1N1Q3/1PP5/2KR4 b - - 2 1 > > >main line at depth 14 was > >14 73 87821 129967224 b7a7 e3e1 f4g2 e1h1 a7f2 h1h3 g2f4 h3g4 f2g2 d1g1 g2g4 g1 >g4 f8g7 c1d2 > >> >>Still two other positions: >> >>38. ... Bf8?! is very suspectful. The queen gives a better support in b8. What >>do you think? > > > >> >>[D]4k3/1q3r2/p2pp1pb/B3p3/2p1Pn1P/P1N1Q3/1PP5/1K1R4 b - - 1 1 > >Here movei likes Bf8 when it finishes depth 13 after less than 6 minutes of >search on my A1000(did not give it more time). > >main line at depth 13(times are of start of the iteration and finishing the >iteration and it was 222.45 seconds to start it and 352.75 to finish it) > >13 58 22245 33166615 h6f8 a5b4 b7c6 c3e2 f8e7 e2f4 e5f4 e3a7 e8f8 a7b8 f8g7 b4d >6 e7d6 b8d6 c6d6 d1d6 >13 58 35275 54861346 h6f8 a5b4 b7c6 c3e2 f8e7 e2f4 e5f4 e3a7 e8f8 a7b8 f8g7 b4d >6 e7d6 b8d6 c6d6 d1d6 > I dont like the move Bf8 at all. I must study better this move. >> >>40. ... Rb7? Why not d5.... >> >>[D]4kb2/5r2/p1qpp1p1/4p3/1Bp1Pn1P/P1N5/1PP5/1K1R2Q1 b - - 5 1 > >Here movei finds d5 at depth 10 and does not changes its mind later. > >analysis at depth 13 after 5 minutes(finish depth 13 after slightly more than 6 >minutes) > >13 78 28015 43491527 d6d5 b4f8 e8f8 g1g5 c6d6 g5h6 f8g8 d1g1 f7h7 g1g6 g8h8 h6g >5 f4g6 g5g6 d6f8 e4d5 e6d5 >13 78 37994 59086392 d6d5 b4f8 e8f8 g1g5 c6d6 g5h6 f8g8 d1g1 f7h7 g1g6 g8h8 h6g >5 f4g6 g5g6 d6f8 e4d5 e6d5 > >Uri Ok your engine goes for the right way here. Rb7 is just a nonsense move here, a mere lost of time. Regards, Arturo Ochoa M.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.