Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pentium4 Extreme Ediction vs AMD 64

Author: Vincent Lejeune

Date: 17:57:14 11/29/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 29, 2003 at 14:59:25, Eugene Nalimov wrote:

>SPEC 2k results show different picture, too:
>
>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q4/cpu2000-20030922-02523.html
>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q3/cpu2000-20030908-02472.html

Are the compiler and the OS 32 bits for the opteron ?


>
>Thanks,
>Eugene
>
>On November 29, 2003 at 14:13:28, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>
>>On November 29, 2003 at 10:41:44, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>>>Intel was not going to stay back just watching AMD get all the attention
>>>http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,1276979,00.asp
>>
>>Pretty misleading. They don't bother testing all of the applications in a
>>specific area (such as media encoding). Take Povray, Yasrt and Realstorm for
>>example. Those three 3d renderers are extremely fast on Athlon chips. It takes a
>>P4 running over 4GHz just to come close to my Athlon XP at 2.5GHz. They only
>>tested the P4 optimized programs, to lop-side the results.
>>
>>As for the media encoding.. they didn't bother testing the fastest encoder for
>>Athlons either. DVD2AVI is the fastest by far. When I tested a P4-2.53 @ 3.5GHz
>>it was a good 30% slower than the Athlon XP 2.5GHz I have when it was using its
>>best encoder vs my Athlon running DVD2AVI. Also, if anyone has done any
>>encoding.. you'll know this is fast:
>>http://www.newageoc.com/pics2/athlon-owns-dvds.jpg
>>
>>As for the FutureMark benchmarks.. they're just a bunch of greedy bastards who
>>optimize for the company that gives them the most money. The PcMark test is
>>biased towards Intel cpus, and now 3DMark2003 is biased towards ATI Radeon
>>cards. If you take a Pentium 2 400MHz and put in an ATI Radeon 9800 in it and
>>run the benchmark it will score 2-3x higher than a P4-3.2GHz with an Nvidia
>>Geforce4. Now, go play any game or other application and you'll see the Pentium
>>2 400MHz would get killed *EVERY* time. Way to go Futuremark!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.