Author: jorge luis borges
Date: 03:56:50 11/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2003 at 05:38:07, Ed Schröder wrote:
>On November 30, 2003 at 04:46:13, Jouni Uski wrote:
>
>>It means, that engine wants draw. No human intervention needed / allowed.
>>
>>Jouni
>
>Your one-liner in more detail:
>
>Go through the rules of any serious computer chess event, the emphasis is fully
>on the fact to eliminate all human intervention, there are 2 computer brains
>fighting the game of chess and any human interference in that fight should be
>avoided by all means. This is the spirit of comp-comp.
>
>Therefore I don't understand and it is against the spirit of the rules to
>suddenly introduce the human factor as an argument.
>
>If there was a technical draw on the board then the game is a draw, game
>finished.
>
>If there is a technical checkmate on the board the game is over too, no one
>would accept further play because a program has a bug and operators who mutually
>decide to continue anyway.
>
>My best,
>
>Ed
If its so, why not play with auto 232? Then no human interference will
happen.
I don't know if the blita tournament will happen this year but, i remenber that
shredder won one event clearly by the skill of S.M.K. in make the moves faster.
Is clear to me that the interaction between operator and engine are part
of the game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.