Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:52:55 11/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2003 at 10:32:26, Vasik Rajlich wrote: >It's hard to believe that after thirty+ years of computer chess tournaments this >situation isn't covered in the rules. It is. Human rules apply except where specific computer rules supercede them. For example, computers play under "blind human" rules. That means they have an operator to move the pieces, but the operator is _passive_ and can offer no help nor make any decisions. > >Personally I'd like to see the operator have the choice. Then the egos can get >involved, which at least makes for better theater, for example > >Van der Wiel,J (2560) - Karpov,A (2750) [C92] >World Cup Rotterdam, 1989 > >1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 0-0 9.h3 >Re8 10.Ng5 Rf8 11.d4 Bb7 12.Nf3 Re8 13.Ng5 Rf8 14.Nf3 Re8 15.Ng5 Rf8 16.Nf3 Re8 >17.Ng5 Rf8 18.Nf3 Na5 19.Bc2 Nc4 20.b3 Nb6 21.Nbd2 Re8 22.dxe5 dxe5 23.Nxe5 Bd6 >24.Nef3 Bxe4 25.Nxe4 Nxe4 26.Qd3 f5 27.Be3 Bf8 28.Rad1 ½-½
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.