Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 12:55:09 11/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2003 at 14:10:45, Slater Wold wrote: >Is not so suspect... > >Johannes Zwanzger said that Shredder was clearly won, and that he did not want >to 'steal the victory' from Shredder because of a stupid bug. THAT is why he >did not get a TD, and kept playing. It was Johannes Zwanzger's choice, and no >one else. No. It was the software's choice. That is "who" is playing the game. Ths software claimed "draw". The operator overruled the claim, thus "taking the dive", throwing the game. What incentive now has SMK to fix his bugs when his opponents all lay down and play dead instead of hold his "bucket of bugs" to the test? If his software is so good, why don't all operators simply resign or forfiet before the game even starts in deferrence to Shredder's acknowledged superiority? Ridiculous!!! > >Shredder won. Period. Fritz won. Period. Shredder accepted a gift 1/2 point which it did not earn. Shameful!!! MH
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.