Author: George Sobala
Date: 14:36:17 11/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2003 at 17:16:23, Robert Allgeuer wrote: > >1. All games played: > > > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > > 1 Shredder : 2889 167 282 13 84.6 % 2593 15.4 % > 2 Fritz : 2810 177 254 13 76.9 % 2601 15.4 % > 3 Junior : 2797 197 277 11 81.8 % 2536 18.2 % > 4 Brutus : 2734 204 311 11 77.3 % 2522 9.1 % > 5 List : 2623 272 272 8 50.0 % 2623 25.0 % > 6 Green Light : 2541 247 210 11 54.5 % 2509 18.2 % > 7 Diep : 2510 247 210 11 54.5 % 2478 18.2 % > 8 Chinito : 2463 272 247 11 45.5 % 2495 0.0 % > 9 Quark : 2444 250 237 11 40.9 % 2507 9.1 % > 10 ParSOS : 2422 210 247 11 45.5 % 2454 18.2 % > 11 Deep Sjeng : 2375 250 237 11 40.9 % 2439 9.1 % > 12 Jonny : 2370 228 227 11 36.4 % 2467 18.2 % > 13 Falcon : 2368 279 244 10 35.0 % 2475 10.0 % > 14 Nexus : 2306 207 219 11 31.8 % 2439 27.3 % > 15 Hossa : 2087 360 210 10 15.0 % 2388 10.0 % > 16 Ruy Lopez : 2079 529 203 10 10.0 % 2461 0.0 % > > > >2. With Shredder-Jonny a draw: > > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > > 1 Shredder : 2845 172 230 13 80.8 % 2595 23.1 % > 2 Fritz : 2802 177 254 13 76.9 % 2593 15.4 % > 3 Junior : 2795 197 277 11 81.8 % 2534 18.2 % > 4 Brutus : 2735 204 311 11 77.3 % 2523 9.1 % > 5 List : 2619 272 272 8 50.0 % 2619 25.0 % > 6 Green Light : 2542 247 210 11 54.5 % 2510 18.2 % > 7 Diep : 2512 247 210 11 54.5 % 2480 18.2 % > 8 Chinito : 2464 272 247 11 45.5 % 2496 0.0 % > 9 Quark : 2446 250 237 11 40.9 % 2510 9.1 % > 10 ParSOS : 2424 210 247 11 45.5 % 2456 18.2 % > 11 Jonny : 2404 192 237 11 40.9 % 2468 27.3 % > 12 Deep Sjeng : 2381 250 237 11 40.9 % 2445 9.1 % > 13 Falcon : 2369 279 244 10 35.0 % 2477 10.0 % > 14 Nexus : 2312 207 219 11 31.8 % 2444 27.3 % > 15 Hossa : 2094 360 210 10 15.0 % 2395 10.0 % > 16 Ruy Lopez : 2083 529 203 10 10.0 % 2465 0.0 % > > >Robert These tables show a huge gulf in ELO between the top 3 and the rest - Brutus huffing and puffing to catch up, the disqualified List bit further behind, and the rest nowhere! Now most of this difference was due to sheer brute force depth of search on the multiprocessor rigs beating the single processor machines. But I bet if you set these engines up to play 16 GMs instead of each other, the ELO spread between top and bottom would be far smaller.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.