Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Free speech even - for idiots.

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 12:18:41 11/17/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 17, 1998 at 15:08:21, frank phillips wrote:
>On 16th November Amir Ban wrote at the end of a post about Deep Blue:
>Sometime when the CCC charter will be revised I propose an item that says Bob
>can only post on topics he understands and bothered to check the facts.
>Amir
>
>Hope this applies only to Bob.  I know very little about anything and was hoping
>to say all kinds of stupid things on a number of matters.  I come here to learn
>and there are quite a few members who seem only too willing to put others
>straight.  Some in kind, generous ways.  Others less so.
>
>Who decides if a person is qualified enough to speak on an issue?  And where do
>I get permission?
>
>Any (other) moderator got a view on this?
>
>(BTW I hope this does not apply to Bob or anyone else.).
I rather suspect Amir was a bit 'tongue-in-cheek' on that.  I realize that the
whole Deep Blue project has a lot of people tied in knots, and we are sadly
lacking in data to come to reasonable conclusions.  So there is a real bit of
mustard behind the jabs that take place on this issue.  Nonetheless, I think you
are taking that post a little too seriously.

I think a bit of heat in a debate can make it interesting, as long as it does
not degerate into name-calling, "Did-not!" "Did-so!", finger pointing and so-on.

I don't have any problem with moderators voicing stong views either.  For that
matter, Amir gave me a real good spanking once, for which I am grateful.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.