Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 17:12:28 11/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2003 at 19:56:30, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > > >For me legal move generation means I dont ever make an illegal move. Therefore >your scheme would still be legal move generation by my definition. > >I believe to categorize that way makes sense. > >Georg Okay yes, that's the way I think of it too. However I thought their idea was to not add illegal moves to the list, at all. That scheme might be faster in some cases, like if you sort by an even more expensive SEE() in a position with many illegal moves. -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.