Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New poll Question? Would anyone now claim comps are not GM strength?

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 21:26:35 11/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On November 30, 2003 at 19:59:21, Gerald Wright wrote:

>On November 30, 2003 at 19:56:49, Eye Witness wrote:
>
>>  "If a computer were to play secretly in a tournament like Linares the special
>>preparation would be taken away and a program like Deep Fritz would finish in
>>one of the top positions."  Vladimir Kramnik 2003
>>
>>
>>I submit comps have been GM strength since Fritz 5 on a Pentium 200 machine.
>>Not always against anti-computer play but regular chess play as described above.
>
>
>They have been grandmasters even against anti computer play, if this is not true
>show me the public games where they have been beaten by anti computer play, i am
>not talking about some games where some person claimed to win without evidence.

Check my wins at Lokasoft, against Rebel 12, before and after the Bug Fix, I can
attest they are not Grandmasters, yet.

But believe as you will, and no I didn't play with takebacks, nor did I use
anti-computer play. Besides, what's the fun in that?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.