Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Isn't it an easy case?

Author: Gabor Szots

Date: 05:01:28 12/01/03


If an engine is unable to claim draw on repetition, then it is not a draw if the
opponent plays on. Not a draw even if the same position repeats 10 times.
If the GUI claims the draw, it is as if a spectator would have claimed it,
therefore invalid.

It seems to me that Jonny did not recognize draw because it accepted Shredder's
next move. In this case Shredder was EXTREMELY LUCKY, but nothing illegal or
unethical happened.

I think it is unimportant that the GUI claimed the draw only when the position
had in fact repeated 3 times. In a human tournament, if I make my move, STOP THE
CLOCK, and call the arbiter, my draw claim is still valid. But without the claim
of the player himself, NOT EVEN THE ARBITER has to right to declare a draw. This
is what saved Shredder. An unlucky blow for the Fritz team.

Gábor



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.