Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Generating attack tables: Is this code good?

Author: Tord Romstad

Date: 05:30:21 12/01/03

Go up one level in this thread

On December 01, 2003 at 07:42:52, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>
>I experimented with some incrementally updated attack tables - I gave them up
>because they were too slow.

I had a conversation with Mridul on the ICC some time ago where this topic
came up, and he told me he had the same experience.  Incremental updating
was slower.

>They took about 1000 ns to update per node on my
>Athlon XP 1.5 [although this depends greatly on cache misses].  If you want,
>I'll send you the code.

Thanks, it would be interesting to see!  I'll let you know if I find any
possible improvements, of course.

Tord

• Re: Generating attack tables: Is this code good? Anthony Cozzie 06:38:18 12/01/03
  • Re: Generating attack tables: Is this code good? Tord Romstad 10:33:57 12/01/03
    • Re: Generating attack tables: Is this code good? Will Singleton 11:53:27 12/01/03
      • Re: Generating attack tables: Is this code good? Tord Romstad 12:38:35 12/01/03
  • Re: Generating attack tables: Is this code good? Daniel Clausen 07:56:33 12/01/03
    • Re: Generating attack tables: Is this code good? Anthony Cozzie 09:14:19 12/01/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.