Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 08:21:57 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 30, 2003 at 07:14:31, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 30, 2003 at 06:10:48, jefkaan wrote: > >>On November 30, 2003 at 03:16:21, CLiebert wrote: >> >>>check this out please >>>http://www.beepworld.de/members39/computerschach2/ >> >>this is serious business; if its true, then Icga >>has to apologize (even although Reul didnt show >>his code to them, due to other duties apparently). >> >>And i still wonder who accused List of being >>a Crafty clone; only coz of some names like main.c >>and search.c in the dll ? Let me laugh.. > > >They did not claim that List is a crafty clone. >It is distorting of their words. > >They only accused List for having some part of Crafty. >I do not know what part and I do not know if it is more than 1% of Crafty's >code. > >Maybe programmers who know can at least tell us more details about the claim >against list. I suspect that List contains 0% of crafty at most. ;-) List is NOT bitboard based. List is brilliant, original code. There is absolutely no way on earth that List is a crafty clone. Period. End of story.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.