Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: After FIDE rules Jonny's operator could not even claim the draw

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 08:29:36 12/01/03

Go up one level in this thread

On December 01, 2003 at 04:18:00, Francesco Di Tolla wrote:

>As far as I understand Jonny did not claim draw at all.
>Not because the program did not ask for it while the interface did, but becasue
>both the prorgam and interface NEVER did a draw claim.
>
>The interface showed a pop-up claiming "3 fold repetition" and this is NOT a
>draw claim.
>

Your objection is one of symantics.  You argue with the FORMAT of the message
and the choice of words used in the message.  Did the tournament rule set
specify one and only one way the draw claim had to be worded?  This is a
question of language only.

Bob D.

<snip>

• Re: After FIDE rules Jonny's operator could not even claim the draw William H Rogers 13:40:24 12/01/03
  • Re: After FIDE rules Jonny's operator could not even claim the draw Bob Durrett 16:26:02 12/01/03
• Re: After FIDE rules Jonny's operator could not even claim the draw Francesco Di Tolla 09:18:20 12/01/03
  • Re: After FIDE rules Jonny's operator could not even claim the draw Bob Durrett 16:24:16 12/01/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.