Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 13:09:56 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2003 at 16:02:36, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On December 01, 2003 at 16:00:54, William H Rogers wrote: > >>I simply do not understand the problem. I thought that the three fold move was >>used as an option for a side that was losing by enabling it to claim a draw. >>I have never heard of it being a mandatory draw. >>Bill > >Sure, you can simply play the move w/o sending the draw offer :) Sounds >perfectly fine to me. Same goes for the 50-move rule. If neither side claims the >draw, the game continues. > >Sargon That is true, but you won't want your program to continue playing after it has forced a 3 fold repetition, specially if it is losing by material or positionally. This is necessary just in case you have a fanatic as an operator who refuse to stop playing. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.