Author: CLiebert
Date: 13:21:56 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2003 at 13:01:21, Dann Corbit wrote: >I sent a letter to David Levy I doubt, too. But whats speaking against making trials using ideas of crafty in early versions? Or using some less important parts in early versions? Is this making a clone or a crafty-based version? Mathias Wüllenweber wrote in CSS 5/02: "Der veröffentlichte Code von Crafty hat zur Verbreitung von parallelen Schachprogrammen beigetragen.... es bedeutet eine immense Starthilfe, sich mit einem gut funktionierenden Verfahren kritisch auseinanderzusetzen." I am shure that every new programmer will do so - and why not? Therefore its public - isn´t it. I am sure M.Feist and M.Wüllenweber did it before trying Deep Fritz, too. But it doesn´t mean that they are cloning the programm. And why should every programmer doing well done things againt and again when generell ideas are public - like WB-Connection, UCI, TB-Support, maybe timeparts, Hashtables ... what is allowed what forbidden? Where is border? Chr.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.