Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 14:05:11 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2003 at 15:57:10, William H Rogers wrote: >Let me answer for Dan if I may. It is true that Dan looked at an earlier version >of List but that does not mean it is the same one that played in the tournement. >I don't understand why people don't get that fact. Fact is that ICGA had based the demand for code inspection on older versions of List. "...The complaint is supported by circumstantial evidence given to the Tournament Committee by the complainant. This evidence relates to two older versions of LIST, namely 4.60 and 5.04 which are publicly available." from http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1330 >Bill
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.