Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 15:06:31 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2003 at 17:20:25, margolies,marc wrote: >Why do you want to paint DC into a corner. He does not need to voice a strong >opinion based on unavailable evidence and we already know what DC thinks about >what he has seen--partially exculpatory evidence. >We also know that we need the whole code-- and to compile it again-- then to >check the output against tournament play-- in order to be sure we have seen the >true code. (this was RH's observation) and then the truth will be very clear >because Crafty's code is a known factor already. >We also need to remember that the exe file is not the engine but constructs the >engine in the machines memory (RH's observation(, so two very different-looking >exe files can produce some similar results (my conclusion). Maybe you knew what DC thought, but somehow I missed it. I did see that someone posted his opinion from the Winboard forum, which was softened in his post here. I asked Dann to expound because Dann is the C optimization guru on this board and if he can't tell beyond a reasonable doubt, that leaves me wondering who could. There was no disrespect to Dann intended. Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.