Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 16:31:16 12/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 01, 2003 at 15:45:09, David H. McClain wrote: >On December 01, 2003 at 13:01:21, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>I sent a letter to David Levy > >But until, and if, Fritz Ruel releases his code the point is academic. > >DHM What do you mean? By what standard should List's guilt or innocence be determined by: (1) List is guilty until proven innocent? (2) List is innocent until proven guilty? (3) Guilt or innocence is determined by the preponderance of the evidence? As far as I see it, by the standards of (2) or (3), List is innocent. Are you really advocating (1)?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.