Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:18:42 12/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2003 at 03:34:31, Roberto Nerici wrote: >>>>July 4. >>>>What a bunch of morons. >>> >>>Would have you gone anyway? >>> >>>Roberto/. >> >>Perhaps if the ICGA provided flak vests. Bruce has attended recent >>events. As have others over here. I am not the _only_ USA computer >>chess person, you know??? > >Of course I know. >You forgot to mention Charles and James (Noonian and Insomniac), both of whom >have also attended a recent WCCC. > >My point is that I don't believe you would go to an event in Israel regardless >of the date. I don't know if you would go to a WCCC outside North America, I have attended an event in London, I flew to Paris in 1984 to do a chess demo. I have gone to Canada. And I have traveled multiple times to Europe over the past N years. I was even at the _first_ WCCC event although I did not participate, in Sweden. My problem is time. how to take about 2 weeks off from classes? The events are now too long. What is the point in 11 rounds with 16 participants? Makes absolutely no sense at all. It just drags out the event and triples the cost and time. We don't have 2 week conferences anywhere. Care to guess why that is? >regardless of the exact location, the amount of money provided or the date, but >you have posted about this sort of thing _many_ times and the impression I have >got is that you would not. > >If any of the above, or any other US engine author, would go to WCCC12 if it was >on another date, then that would be a shame and I would be interested to read a >post by them. > >Roberto/. Again, the date is not the _only_ issue. It is a minor one. The time is the main issue, followed closely by the cost. For example, in the ACM events we alternated east coast and west coast. I managed to make it to almost all. One in Nashville TN was close. One in LA was a long trip. Next year NYC. Close. Seattle. Long trip. We balanced it and always had more local participation than remote participation. But it fostered the interest, which was the _point_. The ICGA used to do that as required by the charter. Somewhere that went in the tank.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.