Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 08:02:23 12/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2003 at 10:14:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 02, 2003 at 09:52:42, martin fierz wrote: > >>On December 02, 2003 at 09:26:32, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On December 02, 2003 at 08:49:57, Drexel,Michael wrote: >>> >>>>On December 02, 2003 at 04:44:48, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>from FCP forum >>>>> >>>>>Just a litlle tournement with Ruffian 2.0 final version. >>>>>30 min/game , AMD XP2800+ @ 2150Mhz >>>>>All programs used their own book >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>ruffian01 Diksmuide 2003 >>>>> 1 2 3 >>>>>1 Ruffian 2.0.0 **** 0111 ½11½ 6.0/8 >>>>>2 Hiarcs 9 1000 **** 101½ 3.5/8 >>>>>3 Fritz 8 ½00½ 010½ **** 2.5/8 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>I'm not interested at all in biased tourney results. >>>> >>>>If Ruffian would have scored 2.5 points and Fritz 8 6 points we would never have >>>>heared anything of it. >>>> >>>>Michael >>> >>>I do not know and I have no idea who made the tournament and if he announced in >>>advance that he is going to do tournament with these participants before >>>starting. >>> >>> >>>Ruffian scores so far only 4.5/8 in the premier of WBEC >>> >>>Of course there are not enough games to know but the result so far is bad and >>>previous Ruffian scored better in WBEC >>> >>>For me every result of less than 79% in WBEC suggest that there was not a very >>>big improvement in Ruffian after Ruffian1.0.1 already scored 79% against only >>>slightly weaker opponents. >>> >>>see http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his3rdedition.html for Ruffian1.0.1's >>>previous results >>> >>>Uri >> >>hi uri, >> >>i've been wondering for some time now, how much better is the movei 0.08.131 >>than the version 0.07.99 that is public? >> >>cheers >> martin > >More than 100 elo better. > >It beated 0.07.99 in the nunn1 match 14.5-5.5 Past tense of "beat" is "beat", which would work in your sentence just fine. You could also have used "defeated". There is no such word "beated" in English. No big deal. Common mistake where English is not first language. :) Regards, MH > >I did not play the nunn2 match between them but more than 100 elo better is also >confirmed by tests of beta testers(I do not know the exact difference and my >estimate is 150-200 elo difference in blitz and I do not know about longer time >control). > >Main improvement except speed and some search tricks are that 0.08.131 has some >knowledge about king safety and about pawn structure(0.07.99 does not evaluate >passed pawns) and about pawns relative to the kings in endgames. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.