Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 12:05:01 12/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2003 at 09:26:32, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 02, 2003 at 08:49:57, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On December 02, 2003 at 04:44:48, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>from FCP forum >>> >>>Just a litlle tournement with Ruffian 2.0 final version. >>>30 min/game , AMD XP2800+ @ 2150Mhz >>>All programs used their own book >>> >>> >>> >>>ruffian01 Diksmuide 2003 >>> 1 2 3 >>>1 Ruffian 2.0.0 **** 0111 ½11½ 6.0/8 >>>2 Hiarcs 9 1000 **** 101½ 3.5/8 >>>3 Fritz 8 ½00½ 010½ **** 2.5/8 >>> >>> >>>Jouni >> >>I'm not interested at all in biased tourney results. >> >>If Ruffian would have scored 2.5 points and Fritz 8 6 points we would never have >>heared anything of it. >> >>Michael > >I do not know and I have no idea who made the tournament and if he announced in >advance that he is going to do tournament with these participants before >starting. > > >Ruffian scores so far only 4.5/8 in the premier of WBEC > >Of course there are not enough games to know but the result so far is bad and >previous Ruffian scored better in WBEC Look at Rebel 12 and The King 3.23 (I suppose default). I don't think you can expect it to score 79%. The participants are very strong winboard engines. > >For me every result of less than 79% in WBEC suggest that there was not a very >big improvement in Ruffian after Ruffian1.0.1 already scored 79% against only >slightly weaker opponents. I think they were considerably weaker on average. Michael > >see http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his3rdedition.html for Ruffian1.0.1's >previous results > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.