Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 18:55:34 12/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2003 at 21:00:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >Makes sense, and points out that there is a _big_ cost for doing that still. >The EBF is meaningless when N-1 and N are _both_ doing something that is "bad" >in terms of tree search space. Why is it bad? If program A has an EBF of 2, and program B has an EBF of 3, wouldn't you want program A even if program A was 16x slower than program B? Depth A Nodes B Nodes Who finishes first? 1 100 100 B 2 200 300 B 3 400 900 B 4 800 2700 B 5 1600 8100 B 6 3200 24300 B 7 6400 72900 B 8 12800 218700 A ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.