Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 23:27:34 12/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2003 at 09:44:59, Steven Edwards wrote: >On December 02, 2003 at 09:30:25, Tord Romstad wrote: >>On December 02, 2003 at 08:43:53, Steven Edwards wrote: >>>On December 02, 2003 at 08:09:18, Kim Roper Jensen wrote: >>>>On December 02, 2003 at 07:44:01, Steven Edwards wrote: > >>>Strength: >>> >>> Solves 298/300 WAC (242/300 WAC in under 1 second each) >> >>298/300 in how much time? What hardware? 242/300 at 1 second/position >>seems a bit low, unless you use a slow computer. My latest version gets >>289/300 at 1 second/position when running on a PIV 2.4 GHz. > >Testing is done on a variety of platforms; the fastest is a dual 1 GHz G4. > >As Symbolic is still far from complete, there's little point in comparing its >test suite results except with earlier versions. Most chess programs are far from complete. If you're going to put up test suite results as a meaure of strength, its only reasonable to include the hardware used.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.