Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:23:44 12/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2003 at 02:35:43, Tony Werten wrote: >Personnaly, I think this mail does make the accusation valid. > >Together with the the refusal of the author to show his code, I would have made >the same decision as the organisation did, and have given the same reason for >disqualification. > >Tony I think that we needs more than it. I see a lot of claims without a proof. We talk about old version of list that is freeware so we need instructions for everybody how to generate a proof that the claims are correct. Claiming that a program has the same holes in evaluation is not enough and we need to see examples. Note that attacking list is attacking Dann Corbit indirectly because if the accusation against list can be proved then it mean that Dann is blind in the best case and lied about list in the worst case. I want to believe that the accusations are wrong because I prefer to believe Dann and not somebody who hides and even does not mention his name. I think that even if the accusation are right it was wrong to throw list in the middle of the tournament and it should be punished before the tournament or after it. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.