Author: Tord Romstad
Date: 14:04:09 12/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2003 at 16:07:09, Dann Corbit wrote: >You can save a lot of time running WAC by just running these. The others are >all trivial for all but the weakest engines: (List of positions snipped) I think the whole suite is useful, mainly in order to make sure you haven't broken something when you have made a non-trivial change somewhere in the search. Is there any system in the order in which you list the positions? It all looks completely random to me. For what its worth, here they are in increasing order of difficulty (measured by number of positions to solution) for my engine: Number Plies Time Nodes 062: 1 0.00 <87 254: 1 0.00 <93 052: 1 0.00 <323 091: 1 0.00 <345 078: 1 0.01 <995 152: 2 0.01 <1380 228: 2 0.00 <1566 133: 3 0.02 <3517 176: 3 0.03 <4087 204: 4 0.03 <6396 111: 3 0.04 <9816 019: 4 0.05 <11342 238: 4 0.08 <12204 200: 4 0.08 <14979 256: 5 0.10 <20183 131: 5 0.11 <22660 086: 7 0.07 23170 223: 4 0.13 <24524 248: 6 0.10 25772 272: 6 0.15 25871 270: 6 0.11 29475 141: 7 0.29 52911 214: 6 0.33 57170 283: 5 0.28 <52966 239: 6 0.25 73294 155: 5 0.42 <93995 151: 8 0.34 106803 243: 6 0.51 107186 287: 5 0.65 <109792 269: 8 0.60 110559 071: 7 0.66 116785 265: 8 0.40 119499 196: 7 0.77 133053 291: 7 0.72 140632 252: 5 0.98 <180681 116: 7 0.96 185326 293: 7 1.38 196680 264: 7 1.25 207499 247: 8 1.21 264681 092: 8 1.53 284073 229: 12 2.55 974063 163: 9 5.97 1141973 002: 12 3.86 1188036 241: 9 7.37 1544561 087: 12 5.23 1598581 235: 11 17.37 4123308 100: ? ? ? 230: ? ? ? Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.