Author: Matt Thomas
Date: 23:08:24 12/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2003 at 14:25:30, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On December 03, 2003 at 12:51:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >[snip] > > guess Robert means read(). As said above, I would prefer Standard C functions >>>(if possible). read() is not a Standard C function. >> >>I'm not sure what that means. read() is in every C implementation I have >>ever used. As are the others such as getc/putc, gets/puts, scanf/printf, >>fread/fwrite, read/write, etc... read/write are specifically non-buffered >>calls, and they even worked on MSDOS just fine. > >getc() etc conform to ANSI-C and POSIX.1. >read() etc conform to SVr4, SVID, AT&T, POSIX, X/OPEN, BSD 4.3 (but not ANSI-C) > Was it dropped from ANSI? My Bjarne Strousup book circa 1997 shows it. -Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.