Author: Ernest Bonnem
Date: 10:19:59 12/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
I think one should only compare the Kns. The FritzMark itself is just a rabbit pulled out of the Chessbase hat. Chessbase has never given any explanation of what it actually measures. On December 04, 2003 at 09:30:01, Brian Katz wrote: >Has anyone noticed that the Fritzmark when using Fritz 8.0.0.8 is higher by >approx. 110 to 140 Kns then when using Fritz 8.0.0.23? > >However, when just analysing positions, the Kns seems to be about the same. > >Also, what I found that was interesting......Was when setting the Hash with an >odd number, rather that by 2's or an even number as recommended, the value was >higher in many cases. >I am running an AMD Athlon XP 2600+ with 1 gig DDR RAM >Such as a reading for Fritz 8.0.0.8: > 59 MB Hash> 1339 > 60 MB Hash> 1184 as opposed to 61 MB Hash> 1339 > 66 MB Hash> 1318...............67 MB Hash> 1339 >128 MB Hash> 1276..............129 MB Hash> 1297 >Now if you try making comparisons by using Friz 8.0.0.23 you may find that you >get a reading of 110 to 140 Kns lower than with 8.0.0.8. > Has anyone found similar results? > If no one has tried making comparisons between odd vs even settings, give it a >shot, you may find it interesting. You may also find that there is a big >difference in the reading between engine versions. >Brian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.