Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 10:48:31 12/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
>Can you already inspect the generated code? Does int (32-bit)-functions use >"ret eax" or the one byte prefixed "ret rax"? The is only ret instruction. The question was intended how the caller use the register result of an 32-bit int function, eax or already sign extended rax? >I guess, after the bsr/bsf, >shorter 32-bit instructions are fine, specially if unsigned (due to the signed >int index penalty).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.