Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 13:06:55 12/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
I didnt realize moveI has become that strong, congratulations ! Is the current version available ? Georg On December 05, 2003 at 14:59:54, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 05, 2003 at 12:54:00, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On December 05, 2003 at 10:40:14, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>>W Ke2 Rb1 Be3 Nc3g5 a5f4g4 >>>>B Kf7 Rc8 Bf8 Nd6g6 a7b6c7e7g7 >>>> >>>>white moved >>>> >>>>31...Ke8 >>>> >>>>Fritz8 considers Rxb3 with -1.19 >>> >>>I am happy to hear that it gets a better position. >>> >>>Fritz is better and I do not think that movei is a good endgame player so it >>>will certainly be a surprise if movei can win. >>> >>>I guess that something in the position may be wrong because >>>Rxb3 suggests that there is a piece at b3. >> >>i guess there was also a pawn on b3. >> >>I will later post the whole game. >> >> >> >> >>>I see that movei is 2 pawns up. >>>How did it happen? >> >>Fritz played not good. >>i did not see the whole game. I started the autoplayer and when i later >>came to the computers i was very astonished myself. >> >>I will post the whole game later this evening. >>I hope you can stand this :-)) > >I guess that the game was finished in movei's win from your words inspite of the >fact that you did not say it directly. > >> >>BTW: from watching the game, or the few moves and computations i saw, it did NOT >>looked that Fritz was stronger. The evaluations and the way it made progress in >>the iterations related between the 2 programs showed that movei was really good. >> >>did you ever tested the program on that level (40/120 , 20/60) ? >>Or do you normally play faster time controls ?? > >I usually test faster time control but I know that movei has not a lot of >knowledge in it's static evaluation. > >I also know that improvement in the search that are relevant for all time >controls are still not implemented. > >40/120 40/120 is ok for it but I am afraid that there may be problems with >40/120 20/60. > >The slowest time control that it is tested is 40/40 in WBEC on faster hardware >and so far it has 8 out of 14 in the second division in >http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/ > >I am sure that it is weaker than Fritz8 but in one game everything can happen. >I expect it to fight against the last place with programs like postmodernist or >wildcat. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.