Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Rebel 10 problem?! (To Ed)

Author: Komputer Korner

Date: 00:25:39 11/19/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 17, 1998 at 05:32:17, Harald Faber wrote:

>On November 16, 1998 at 11:44:52, Komputer Korner wrote:
>
>>>Hi Ed,
>>>I am not sure to reach you via e-mail so I write it here too:
>>>
>>>I have seen strange behaviour in Rebel10. I have AMD-K6-200 and Laptop166MMX. In
>>>the same position the AMD has a diiferent best move with a different value than
>>>the 166MMX AT SAME SEARCH DEPTH. How is this possible, any explainations?
>>
>>Harald, you should know better. We have had discussions about this phenomenon
>>many times. There are a whole host of reasons ranging from hash table anomolies
>>to move ordering, all of which are affected by different times used. Determinism
>>is an impossiblity in present day chess programs so forget about the idea.
>>Komputer Korner
>
>Hmm. Then s.th. is wrong, either my point of view or the program itself. I
>always assumed depth=8 is depth=8, no matter which computer is used. Only slower
>computer should need longer to reach that depth but the result should be the
>same. I am talking of analysis mode, same explaination?


There is no guarantee that the same move will be found. However 2 computers that
are roughly the same speed and have the same  architecture present a level
playing field for 2 programs, but as for duplicating moves exactly, that won't
happen all the time. Probably Bob has done some tests on this, but determinism
is a dream with chess programs.
--
Komputer Korner



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.