Author: Tim Foden
Date: 13:19:48 12/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2003 at 11:02:22, Alvaro Jose Povoa Cardoso wrote: > >I've been thinking about the efficiency of the history heuristic at high search >depths. >It seems to me that the history table will be overwritten many times if we have >a search of several billions of nodes. Additionally, as the search moves to >different parts of the tree the history table values will be somewhat trashed. >What do you think we could do about this? >Maybe limit the history heuristic to a certain depth (ex: the nominal depth). > >Comments anyone? What happens in GLC is whenever it increments a value in the history table it checks it against a maximum. If the maximum value is exceeded, it divides all values in the table by 2. Cheers, Tim.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.