Author: Mark Young
Date: 18:45:53 11/19/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 1998 at 20:09:50, Detlef Pordzik wrote: >On November 19, 1998 at 18:36:57, Mark Young wrote: > >>On November 19, 1998 at 16:18:46, Detlef Pordzik wrote: >> >>>On November 18, 1998 at 14:42:14, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>On November 18, 1998 at 12:24:52, Jay Rinde wrote: >>>> >>>>>We are at fault for the ejection of Thorsten Czub! We all knew that to answer >>>>>any of his posts that had to do with Chessbase would send him on a mad rampage. >>>>>But, still, we did. We knew he would snarl and gag and spit, and he did! When >>>>>not speaking of Chessbase Czub gave interesting and informative posts. >>>> >>>>If we had >>>>>just ignored his posts about Chessbase, I am sure he would have gone on to the >>>>>issues most of us came here for. You all know I am right! >>>> >>>>You must be joking. He has been doing this for months, he was not going to stop. >>>>The only action that could be taken was to make him defend his claims. Remember >>>>he alone brought this subject back up. I don't want Thorsten to be ejected, but >>>>I will not stand by and allow this to go unchallenged anymore. >>>> >>> >>>Blaze of Glory - congratulations ! >>>Now you got what you wanted, eh ? >> >>What did I get that I wanted? If you mean I wanted Thorsten removed from CCC, >>this is just dead wrong. I have never asked any moderator to have Thorsten >>removed. In fact when Thorsten was ejected the first time I messaged Bruce that >>I would support any effort to bring Thorsten back when the moderators see fit. >> >>Just because I strongly disagree with someone, does not mean I what that person >>banned. >> >>>Totally satisfied now ? >>>First the Gentlemen Moritz and Dirk, who assumingly are shattered and hurt down >>>to the bone by mean TC - now it seems to be you. >>> >>>BTW : would you mind telling me, who you are, Mr. Young - to " allow " or " not >>>allow " ? >>>( Don't answer - forget it ! ) >> >>No, you will get an answer to this. I am a member of CCC in good standing, that >>alone gives me the right to challenge any postings on CCC, It does not matter >>who posted it. >> >>> >>>ELVIS > >Good Lord, Mr. Young - now I catch up ! >All that's needed to pick up a something like this is " a good standing " ! Yes, that is all that is needed. If you wish to let it slide by that is your right. >Well, in this case - I surelly ain't that interested in my " standing ", yet, >I'd never allow myself to " forbid nor allow " anybody up here a something. >Might just be a question of.....personal....taste. > >As I said before, Sir - won't you just forget it ! >TC is gone - again - and that's just it. He is not gone because of something I have done. He did it to himself. Just because someone can't control themselves doesn't give them the right to make claims without being challenged. That is the basis of debate. In fact there wouldn't be much point to a forum like this without this kind of exchange. What is improper is to go beyond debate....In Thorsten's case it would have been better if he had taken Joe Friday's sage advice..."Just the facts Ma'am." > >ELVIS
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.