Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:22:16 12/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2003 at 16:12:46, Brian Richardson wrote: >On December 09, 2003 at 09:52:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 08, 2003 at 20:59:26, Slater Wold wrote: >> > >snipped > >>>Ok, that's the itanium doing 32. Anyone got anything with it doing 64? Or did >>>it suck there too? >> >> >>The original was not very good. Itanium-2 (Mckinley) is _very_ good. Close >>to the opteron even though it is clocked at 1/2 the opteron's speed. > >Actually, McKinley was also pretty poor, IIRC. I had emailed Bob some Crafty >bench command test results. Now the 3rd generation Madison is much better. Eugene was close to 1M nodes per second at 1ghz. I don't think I have his numbers immediately handy but he might supply them again...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.