Author: Slater Wold
Date: 23:08:35 12/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2003 at 01:48:36, Russell Reagan wrote:
>On December 10, 2003 at 01:22:23, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>Ususally you'll see 'like results'.
>
>By "like results" do you mean that a program that doesn't benefit from the
>64-bit registers (a non-bitboard program would fall into this category) will
>perform similar to its 32-bit counterpart?
>
>In other words, we shouldn't expect these kinds of speedups for 0x88-style
>programs?
I can't say on 0x88...but I can report this:
XP3200+ 643200+ FX51
2.2G 2.0G 2.2G
gzip = 1084 1084 1203
vpr = 734 1102 1170
gcc = 822 1234 1427
mcf = 530 911 944
crafty = 1324 1370 1505
parser = 995 1241 1345
eon = 1503 1445 1588
perlbmk = 1367 1336 1457
gap = 1154 1385 1542
vortex = 1693 2007 2147
bzip2 = 929 1077 1144
twolf = 985 1282 1366
I wouldn't expect 41%. But you can cleary see that all these programs, even
compiled in 32-bit @ the same clock speeds, got some serious speedups over the
Athlon XP. (Except eon.)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.