Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 01:23:17 12/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2003 at 02:08:35, Slater Wold wrote:
>I can't say on 0x88...but I can report this:
>
> XP3200+ 643200+ FX51
> 2.2G 2.0G 2.2G
>
>gzip = 1084 1084 1203
>vpr = 734 1102 1170
>gcc = 822 1234 1427
>mcf = 530 911 944
>crafty = 1324 1370 1505
>parser = 995 1241 1345
>eon = 1503 1445 1588
>perlbmk = 1367 1336 1457
>gap = 1154 1385 1542
>vortex = 1693 2007 2147
>bzip2 = 929 1077 1144
>twolf = 985 1282 1366
>
>I wouldn't expect 41%. But you can cleary see that all these programs, even
>compiled in 32-bit @ the same clock speeds, got some serious speedups over the
>Athlon XP. (Except eon.)
I multiplied by 1.1 to get the approximate performance of an Athlon 64 @ 2.2GHz,
then took the 64-bit average and compared with the 32-bit numbers. It looks like
the hardware alone gives very nice speedups for some things, but only marginal
for others (including 32-bit Crafty). It makes sense that Crafty would get an
additional bigger boost than most programs from 64-bit compilation.
XP3200+ 643200+ 643200+ FX51 Average %
2.2G 2.0G @2.2G 2.2G 64bit Increase
mcf = 530 911 1002 944 974 83.7%
gcc = 822 1234 1357 1427 1392 69.3%
vpr = 734 1102 1212 1170 1191 62.2%
twolf = 985 1282 1410 1366 1388 40.9%
parser = 995 1241 1365 1345 1355 36.1%
gap = 1154 1385 1523 1542 1532 32.7%
vortex = 1693 2007 2207 2147 2177 28.5%
bzip2 = 929 1077 1184 1144 1164 25.2%
crafty = 1324 1370 1507 1505 1506 13.7%
gzip = 1084 1084 1192 1203 1197 10.4%
perlbmk = 1367 1336 1469 1457 1463 7.0%
eon = 1503 1445 1589 1588 1588 5.6%
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.