Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:40:58 12/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2003 at 08:22:22, Terry McCracken wrote: >On December 10, 2003 at 03:22:44, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On December 09, 2003 at 21:18:39, Roger D Davis wrote: >> >>>>>>FWIW, I have the highest arbiter certification awarded by the Chess Federation of Canada: National Tournament Director. >>> >>>You've started what has turned out to be an enormous thread, and you've openly >>>stated your credentials in doing so. Reading the responses, my sympathies lie >>>with the other posters. I would like to ask, however, that you defend your >>>perspective. If you truly believe that those who disagree need to reexamine the >>>rules or their own logic, this shouldn't be hard to do. >>> >>>Roger >> >>Perhaps after reading the responses he realizes he's wrong. :) >> >>-Peter > >I doubt it. He posted due to a request, and wasn't intending to fight about it. >Besides, he's been treated with contempt! Why should he be bothered to reply, >only to be attacked by a pack of wolves? > >Terry He was attacked with facts and experience. I suspect he recognizes the concept of "untenable position" pretty well...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.