Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 15:38:03 12/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 09, 2003 at 20:22:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 09, 2003 at 16:12:46, Brian Richardson wrote: > >>On December 09, 2003 at 09:52:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On December 08, 2003 at 20:59:26, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >> >>snipped >> >>>>Ok, that's the itanium doing 32. Anyone got anything with it doing 64? Or did >>>>it suck there too? >>> >>> >>>The original was not very good. Itanium-2 (Mckinley) is _very_ good. Close >>>to the opteron even though it is clocked at 1/2 the opteron's speed. >> >>Actually, McKinley was also pretty poor, IIRC. I had emailed Bob some Crafty >>bench command test results. Now the 3rd generation Madison is much better. > > >Eugene was close to 1M nodes per second at 1ghz. I don't think I have his >numbers immediately handy but he might supply them again... I don't remember exact numbers, but on 1GHz Itanium2 (McKinley) Crafty got something like 900-1000knps when executing "bench" command. Not great, but reasonable good number. On 1.5GHz Itanium2 (Madison) Crafty is getting 1,357knps. If necessary I can send executable to Bob, so any volunteer can run his/her own tests. Thanks, Eugene
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.