Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Nxe4 Bug by Fritz - here the first message and Answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Author: Eduard Nemeth

Date: 23:02:51 12/10/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 11, 2003 at 02:00:03, Eduard Nemeth wrote:

>On December 11, 2003 at 01:03:19, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On December 10, 2003 at 17:43:13, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>
>>>English with translator:
>>>
>>>Here 2 further games, newer date than test for DF8 and X3D Fritz.  One of it is
>>>even a corr. game.  Even in the 5-Varation mode sees Fritz 8,0023 (X3D Fritz?)
>>>not that one could beat pawn also on e4.  The analysis of Shredder serves only
>>>for the comparison.  I have these games already longer stored, now bring I her
>>>only between in it still.  (I have however still more in stock if necessary?)
>>>
>>>
>>>[Event "XVIII Open Cappelle la Grande FRA"]
>>>[Site "?"]
>>>[Date "2002.??.??"]
>>>[Round "5"]
>>>[White "Tillet, L."]
>>>[Black "Jakubowski, K."]
>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>[ECO "B22"]
>>>[WhiteElo "2180"]
>>>[BlackElo "2455"]
>>>[PlyCount "112"]
>>>[EventDate "2002.??.??"]
>>>
>>>1. e4 c5 2. c3 d6 3. d4 Nf6 4. dxc5 Nc6 5. Bc4 Nxe4 6. Bxf7+ Kxf7 7. Qh5+ Kg8
>>>8. Qd5+ e6 9. Qxe4 d5 10. Qe2 Bxc5 11. Nf3 Bd7 12. Bf4 Qf8 13. Bg3 Re8 14. Ne5
>>>Nxe5 15. Bxe5 a6 16. a4 b5 17. b3 h5 18. O-O h4 19. h3 Qf7 20. Nd2 Qh5 21. Rfe1
>>>Rf8 22. Nf3 Rh6 23. Bd4 Bd6 24. Ne5 Bxe5 25. Qxh5 Rxh5 26. Rxe5 Rxe5 27. Bxe5
>>>bxa4 28. bxa4 Rf5 29. Bc7 e5 30. Re1 d4 31. Rxe5 Rxe5 32. Bxe5 d3 33. Kf1 Bxa4
>>>34. Ke1 Bb5 35. Bc7 Kf7 36. Bd8 Ke6 37. c4 Bxc4 38. Kd2 Kd7 39. Bxh4 a5 40. Kc3
>>>a4 41. Bg5 a3 42. Bc1 a2 43. Bb2 Ke6 44. Kd2 g6 45. Ke3 Bb5 46. f4 Kd5 47. g4
>>>Kc4 48. Kd2 Bd7 49. Ba1 Bc6 50. h4 Bf3 51. f5 gxf5 52. gxf5 Bh5 53. f6 Bg6 54.
>>>Bb2 Bf7 55. Ba1 Bg6 56. Bb2 Kd5 1/2-1/2
>>>
>>>[D]r1bqkb1r/pp2pppp/2np1n2/2P5/2B1P3/2P5/PP3PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq - 0 1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Analysis by Fritz 8.0023:
>>>
>>>1. ² (0.34): 5...dxc5 6.Dxd8+ Sxd8 7.Sd2 Ld7 8.e5 Sg4 9.Sgf3 b5 10.Ld5 Lc6
>>>2. ² (0.34): 5...Se5 6.Le2 Sc6 7.Sd2 d5 8.exd5 Dxd5 9.Sgf3 Dxc5 10.0-0
>>>3. ² (0.37): 5...e6 6.Lg5 dxc5 7.Dxd8+ Sxd8 8.e5 Sg4 9.Sf3 Sc6 10.Lb5 Ld7
>>>4. ² (0.41): 5...Dd7 6.De2 dxc5 7.e5 Sd5 8.Sf3 a6 9.0-0 b5 10.Ld3
>>>5. ² (0.50): 5...e5 6.Sf3 dxc5 7.Dxd8+ Sxd8 8.Sbd2 Ld6 9.0-0 Lg4 10.Td1 Lxf3
>>>6. ² (0.56): 5...Sa5 6.Lb5+ Sc6 7.e5 Sd7 8.e6 fxe6 9.Le3 Dc7 10.Df3 Sxc5
>>>7. ² (0.56): 5...g6 6.cxd6 Sxe4 7.Lxf7+ Kxf7 8.Dd5+ Kg7 9.Dxe4 Lf5 10.De3 h6
>>>11.Sd2 exd6
>>>8. ² (0.56): 5...Da5
>>>
>>>
>>>r1bqkb1r/pp2pppp/2np1n2/2P5/2B1P3/2P5/PP3PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq - 0 1
>>>
>>>Analysis by Shredder 7.04:
>>>
>>>1. = (0.00): 5...Sxe4 6.Sf3 dxc5 7.Sbd2 Sd6 8.0-0 Sxc4 9.Sxc4 Lg4 10.Le3 Dxd1
>>>11.Taxd1 Lxf3 12.gxf3
>>>2. = (0.16): 5...Se5 6.Le2 Sc6 7.Sf3 Sxe4 8.0-0 Sxc5 9.Lg5 Lg4
>>>3. ² (0.29): 5...e6 6.Sf3 Sxe4 7.cxd6 Lxd6 8.Dc2 Sf6 9.0-0 0-0 10.Td1
>>>4. ² (0.29): 5...dxc5 6.Dxd8+ Sxd8 7.Sd2 Le6 8.Lb5+ Ld7 9.Lxd7+ Sxd7 10.Sgf3 e6
>>>5. ² (0.40): 5...Dd7 6.Sf3 Sxe4 7.0-0 Sxc5
>>>6. ² (0.61): 5...Sa5 6.Lb5+ Sc6 7.f3 e5 8.Se2 dxc5 9.Lxc6+ bxc6 10.Dxd8+ Kxd8
>>>11.0-0
>>>7. ² (0.64): 5...g6 6.Sf3 Sxe4 7.Dd5 Le6 8.Dxe4 d5 9.Lxd5 Dxd5 10.Dxd5 Lxd5
>>>8. ² (0.64): 5...Tb8 6.Sf3 Sxe4 7.Dd5 Le6 8.Dxe4 d5 9.Lxd5 Dxd5 10.Dxd5 Lxd5
>>
>>
>>What about 5...Nxe4 6.Bxf7 again? Still a position which black should try to
>>reach? Personally, I doubt that...
>>
>>
>>>[Event "corr"]
>>>[Site "?"]
>>>[Date "1999.??.??"]
>>>[Round "?"]
>>>[White "Redmond, PC."]
>>>[Black "Bennett, Tony"]
>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>[ECO "B00"]
>>>[PlyCount "40"]
>>>[EventDate "1999.??.??"]
>>>
>>>1. e4 Nc6 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d4 Nxe4 4. Bxf7+ Kxf7 5. Qh5+ Kg8 6. Qd5+ e6 7. Qxe4
>>>Qf6 8. Nf3 d5 9. Qd3 Bd6 10. Bg5 Nb4 11. Qe2 Qg6 12. Na3 b6 13. O-O Ba6 14. Qd2
>>>Rf8 15. Ne5 Bxe5 16. dxe5 Bxf1 17. Rxf1 c5 18. c3 Nc6 19. f4 Qh5 20. Qe1 h6 0-1
>>>
>>>
>>>Redmond,P - Bennett,T
>>>
>>>[D]r1bqkb1r/pppppppp/2n2n2/8/2BPP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq d3 0 1
>>>
>>>Analysis by Fritz 8.0023:
>>>
>>>1. = (0.03): 3...d5 4.exd5 Sxd5 5.Sf3 Lg4 6.0-0 Dd6 7.h3 Lh5 8.Te1 0-0-0 9.Dd3
>>>2. = (0.25): 3...d6 4.Sc3 e6 5.Sf3 d5 6.exd5 exd5 7.Lb5 a6 8.Lxc6+ bxc6 9.0-0
>>>Le7
>>>3. = (0.25): 3...e5 4.d5 Sb8 5.Sf3 Lc5 6.0-0 d6 7.Lg5 Lg4 8.Lb5+ Sbd7 9.Sbd2
>>>4. ² (0.44): 3...b5 4.Lxb5 Sxe4 5.d5 Sb8 6.Ld3 Sf6 7.c4 e6 8.dxe6
>>>5. ² (0.34): 3...e6 4.e5 Sd5 5.Sf3 d6 6.0-0 dxe5 7.Sxe5 Sxe5 8.dxe5 Lc5 9.Sd2
>>>6. ² (0.34): 3...h6 4.e5 d5 5.Le2 Se4 6.Sf3 Lg4 7.0-0 e6 8.Sbd2
>>>7. ² (0.44): 3...Sa5 4.Ld3 Sc6 5.e5 Sd5 6.Le4 Sb6 7.Se2 d5 8.Ld3
>>>8. ² (0.59): 3...a6
>>>
>>>Redmond,P - Bennett,T
>>>r1bqkb1r/pppppppp/2n2n2/8/2BPP3/8/PPP2PPP/RNBQK1NR b KQkq d3 0 1
>>>
>>>Analysis by Shredder 7.04:
>>>
>>>1. ³ (-0.47): 3...Sxe4 4.Lxf7+ Kxf7 5.Dh5+ Kg8 6.Dd5+ e6 7.Dxe4 d5 8.De3 Sb4
>>>9.Sa3 e5
>>>2. = (0.19): 3...e5 4.Sf3 exd4 5.0-0 Lc5 6.e5 Sg4 7.Lg5 Le7 8.Lxe7
>>>3. = (0.22): 3...d6 4.Sc3 Sxe4 5.Lxf7+ Kxf7 6.Sxe4 Lf5 7.Sg3 e6 8.Sxf5 exf5 9.d5
>>>Se5
>>>4. ² (0.40): 3...e6 4.e5 d5 5.Ld3 Sd7 6.Sf3 Le7 7.0-0 h5
>>>5. ² (0.45): 3...d5 4.exd5 Sxd5 5.Sf3 Lg4 6.0-0 e6 7.Lb5 Df6 8.Lxc6+ bxc6 9.Sbd2
>>>6. ² (0.51): 3...h6 4.e5 d5 5.Lb5 Se4 6.f3 Sg5 7.Se2 e6 8.Sbc3 Le7 9.0-0
>>>7. ² (0.67): 3...g6 4.e5 Sh5 5.Sc3 d6 6.exd6 Lg7 7.Sf3 0-0 8.dxc7 Dxc7
>>>8. ² (0.63): 3...Sa5 4.Ld3 Sc6 5.Sf3 d5 6.e5 Se4 7.Sbd2 Lf5 8.0-0 e6 9.Sxe4
>>>
>>>Eduard
>>
>>
>>Also in this second example Bxf7 as response to Nxe4 is possible. Therefore I
>>doubt again that this is the best line black can play. Some funny guys say "I'm
>>wondering about the wanderking" (Ich wundere mich über den Wanderkönig) in my
>>club to such unnecessary (!) king actions. :-)
>>
>>BTW you got the same questions to your other recent post about a similar
>>position. You didn't answer. I wonder why.
>
>Do You cannotunderstand my message, or need You does not understand?
>
>I ask myself seriously Harald whether you my Message (see the answer of Peter
>Ackermann, where he explains it beautifully, further down in message) simply not
>to understand want?
>
>German:
>
>Ich frage mich ernsthaft Harald, ob Du meine Message (schau die Antwort von
>Peter Ackermann, wo er es schön erklärt, weiter unten in einer message) einfach
>nicht verstehen willst?
>
>E.

Look here:

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?334781

.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.