Author: Brian Richardson
Date: 10:44:59 12/11/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 10, 2003 at 20:25:43, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On December 10, 2003 at 19:24:12, Brian Richardson wrote: > >>On December 10, 2003 at 18:38:03, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >> >>>On December 09, 2003 at 20:22:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On December 09, 2003 at 16:12:46, Brian Richardson wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 09, 2003 at 09:52:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 08, 2003 at 20:59:26, Slater Wold wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>snipped >>>>> >>>>>>>Ok, that's the itanium doing 32. Anyone got anything with it doing 64? Or did >>>>>>>it suck there too? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>The original was not very good. Itanium-2 (Mckinley) is _very_ good. Close >>>>>>to the opteron even though it is clocked at 1/2 the opteron's speed. >>>>> >>>>>Actually, McKinley was also pretty poor, IIRC. I had emailed Bob some Crafty >>>>>bench command test results. Now the 3rd generation Madison is much better. >>>> >>>> >>>>Eugene was close to 1M nodes per second at 1ghz. I don't think I have his >>>>numbers immediately handy but he might supply them again... >>> >>>I don't remember exact numbers, but on 1GHz Itanium2 (McKinley) Crafty got >>>something like 900-1000knps when executing "bench" command. Not great, but >>>reasonable good number. >>> >>>On 1.5GHz Itanium2 (Madison) Crafty is getting 1,357knps. >>> >>>If necessary I can send executable to Bob, so any volunteer can run his/her own >>>tests. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Eugene >> >>The 900Knps was for 2 CPUs; 1 CPU was about 500Knps, according to the log files >>(note for Crafty 18.15, Intel compiler, no assembler, no profiling). >> >>Non-recompiled 32bit binary was _much_ slower, of course. > >Ok, I found 900MHz/1.5Mb cache system nearby. Here are the results: > >D:\Documents and Settings\eugenen>\\eugenen6\crafty\wcrafty.exe > >Initializing multiple threads. >System is SMP, not NUMA. >EPD Kit revision date: 1996.04.21 >unable to open book file [./book.bin]. >book is disabled >unable to open book file [./books.bin]. > >Crafty v19.6 (1 cpus) > >White(1): bench >Running benchmark. . . >...... >Total nodes: 100409437 >Raw nodes per second: 749324 >Total elapsed time: 134 >SMP time-to-ply measurement: 4.776119 >White(1): quit > >I expect 1GHz/3Mb cache system to be ~20% faster -- 10% due to higher frequency, >and 10% due to larger cache (or higher cache associativity -- I reported effect >of 1.5Mb cache vs. 3Mb cache here some time ago). 750knps*1.2 == 900knps, so it >will be roughly the number I gave from memory... > >Thanks, >Eugene And the version 18.15 results (19.6 was not out back in January)?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.