Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Distributed perft, current standings and trends

Author: Ingo Bauer

Date: 14:34:47 12/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 12, 2003 at 17:26:04, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>I was wondering if it may be better to track the stats by trillions of moves
>done instead of on a block by block basis. Because the current way doesn't seem
>as if it'd be completely fair. For example.. lets say computer X is twice as
>fast as computer Y. However, computer Y completes two smaller blocks in the same
>time it takes computer X to do one. Now the stats report that computer Y has
>done two blocks, looking like it is twice as fast as computer X when actually
>the reverse is true. Just something to think about. Thanks for the project, I
>always love the distributed stuff. :)

Hi

You are right! The worst thing is that it is ALLWAYS me who get the "big"
problems!

;-)

Seriously: I mentioned that earlier in a thread and hope we see a change or at
least both numbers!

Ingo



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.