Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 14:38:50 12/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2003 at 17:34:47, Ingo Bauer wrote: >On December 12, 2003 at 17:26:04, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>I was wondering if it may be better to track the stats by trillions of moves >>done instead of on a block by block basis. Because the current way doesn't seem >>as if it'd be completely fair. For example.. lets say computer X is twice as >>fast as computer Y. However, computer Y completes two smaller blocks in the same >>time it takes computer X to do one. Now the stats report that computer Y has >>done two blocks, looking like it is twice as fast as computer X when actually >>the reverse is true. Just something to think about. Thanks for the project, I >>always love the distributed stuff. :) > >Hi > >You are right! The worst thing is that it is ALLWAYS me who get the "big" >problems! > >;-) > >Seriously: I mentioned that earlier in a thread and hope we see a change or at >least both numbers! > >Ingo I'm sure from here on it'd be relatively simple to do it as I described. I don't know how easy it will be to figure out who did which blocks already and translate that into a total node figure. I guess it depends on how he setup the logging on the server and how much of a pain it would be to go through everything (PLUS blocks will be rolling in constantly as he's doing that). We'll see I guess. I'm eager to see how it goes. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.