Author: Slater Wold
Date: 17:09:23 12/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2003 at 17:26:04, Aaron Gordon wrote: >I was wondering if it may be better to track the stats by trillions of moves >done instead of on a block by block basis. Because the current way doesn't seem >as if it'd be completely fair. For example.. lets say computer X is twice as >fast as computer Y. However, computer Y completes two smaller blocks in the same >time it takes computer X to do one. Now the stats report that computer Y has >done two blocks, looking like it is twice as fast as computer X when actually >the reverse is true. Just something to think about. Thanks for the project, I >always love the distributed stuff. :) Good point. My P4 2.0Ghz laptop worked on the same problem (set) for 6 hours... My P4 3.06Ghz finished one in 20 minutes.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.