Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 18:37:14 12/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2003 at 20:09:23, Slater Wold wrote: >On December 12, 2003 at 17:26:04, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>I was wondering if it may be better to track the stats by trillions of moves >>done instead of on a block by block basis. Because the current way doesn't seem >>as if it'd be completely fair. For example.. lets say computer X is twice as >>fast as computer Y. However, computer Y completes two smaller blocks in the same >>time it takes computer X to do one. Now the stats report that computer Y has >>done two blocks, looking like it is twice as fast as computer X when actually >>the reverse is true. Just something to think about. Thanks for the project, I >>always love the distributed stuff. :) > >Good point. My P4 2.0Ghz laptop worked on the same problem (set) for 6 hours... > >My P4 3.06Ghz finished one in 20 minutes. Seems my computers are getting the longer problems now.. that what you're seeing? Even with one of my 2.5's pulling 230,000knps I'm getting 3000-4000 second (last one was 3460 seconds) blocks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.