Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:24:23 12/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 12, 2003 at 17:34:32, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >On December 12, 2003 at 16:52:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 12, 2003 at 15:29:55, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >> >>>On December 12, 2003 at 13:49:35, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On December 12, 2003 at 13:40:07, Will Singleton wrote: >>>> >>>>>Here's a position from a recent game, this one gives Amateur fits. >>>>>How long to see black is busted? >>>>> >>>>>[d]4rr2/1b3p1k/pp5p/2b1pQ2/q7/P2R2B1/1PP3PP/2KR4 b - - >>>> >>>> >>>>For Crafty, the bottom begins to fall out at 6 seconds or so, >>> >>>What do you mean by 6 seconds??? 6 seconds on a 100 MHz machine is fantastic, >>>but it is horrible on the fastest quad.... >>> >>>I can't agree more with Christophe about this. PLEASE ADD HARDWARE INFO! >>> >> >>Sorry. It is horrible. It was on a quad 1.8ghz opteron. :) >> >>I figured that was obvious since that is all I have been posting here >>the last two weeks... > >Why don't you print a line before each analysis, reporting the system hardware >and memory? > >I mainly run Falcon in commandline mode, and before each analysis it prints >something like: Not so easy on all the different systems I use. Linux is trivial. Others (say solaris, OS/2, irix, hpux, etc) make this not so easy from a portability issue. > >Falcon 0.050 running on GenuineIntel 733MHz 256MB: >depth time nodes nps score variation > 3/ 6 0.03 0k 7k 0.23 1.e2e4 d7d5 2.b1c3 > 3/ 7 0.04 0k 8k 0.27 1.d2d4 d7d5 2.c1f4 > 4/10 0.04 0k 13k 0.00 1.d2d4 d7d5 2.c1f4 c8f5 > 4/10 0.04 0k 18k 0.03 1.e2e4 g8f6 2.b1c3 e7e5 > 5/12 0.06 3k 53k -0.02 1.e2e4 d7d5 2.d1f3 d5e4 3.f3e4 b8c6 > 5/12 0.08 5k 69k 0.21 1.d2d4 e7e6 2.b1c3 f8b4 3.c1d2 > 6/14 0.13 12k 98k 0.00 1.d2d4 d7d5 2.b1c3 c8f5 3.c1f4 b8c6 > 6/14 0.21 24k 116k 0.06 1.e2e4 b8c6 2.f1c4 c6e5 3.d2d3 e5c4 > 4.d3c4 > 7/15 0.43 57k 134k 0.11 1.e2e4 d7d5 2.e4e5 b8c6 3.f1b5 c8d7 > 4.d2d4 > 7/15 0.52 71k 137k 0.23 1.d2d4 d7d5 2.b1c3 b8c6 3.c1f4 c8f5 > 4.g1f3 > 8/17 0.78 111k 142k 0.04 1.d2d4 d7d5 2.d1d3 d8d6 3.b1c3 g8f6 > 4.c3b5 d6c6 > 9/21 1.85 270k 145k 0.12 1.d2d4 d7d5 2.b1c3 c8f5 3.c1f4 g8f6 > 4.e2e3 b8c6 5.f1b5 > 9/21 2.41 346k 143k 0.15 1.e2e4 d7d5 2.e4d5 d8d5 3.b1c3 d5e5 > 4.d1e2 e5e2 5.f1e2 e7e5 6.c3d5 f8d6 > > > > > >> >> >>> >>> >>>>where >>>>it begins to see it is not ahead. By 60 seconds it has failed low >>>>to white a pawn up and climbing: >>>> >>>> 12-> 4.84 -0.69 1. ... Kg8 2. Bxe5 Bf2 3. Rd4 Rxe5 >>>> 4. Qxe5 Re8 5. Rd8 Bc6 6. Rxe8+ Bxe8 >>>> 7. Rd6 Qb5 8. Qf4 Qg5 <HT> >>>> 13 6.66 -- 1. ... Kg8 >>>> 13 15.28 0.31 1. ... Kg8 2. Bxe5 Bf2 3. Bf6 Re2 4. >>>> Rd8 Bc5 5. R8d4 Rxc2+ 6. Qxc2 Qxc2+ >>>> 7. Kxc2 Bxd4 8. Bxd4 Be4+ 9. Kb3 Rd8 >>>> 13-> 17.91 0.31 1. ... Kg8 2. Bxe5 Bf2 3. Bf6 Re2 4. >>>> Rd8 Bc5 5. R8d4 Rxc2+ 6. Qxc2 Qxc2+ >>>> 7. Kxc2 Bxd4 8. Bxd4 Be4+ 9. Kb3 Rd8 >>>> 14 35.70 0.00 1. ... Kg8 2. Bxe5 Bf2 3. Bf6 Re2 4. >>>> Rd8 Bh4 5. Rxf8+ Kxf8 6. Rd8+ Re8 7. >>>> Rxe8+ Qxe8 8. Bxh4 Qe3+ 9. Kb1 Qg1+ >>>> 10. Ka2 Qxg2 11. Qf4 Qxc2 12. Qxh6+ >>>> 14-> 40.01 0.00 1. ... Kg8 2. Bxe5 Bf2 3. Bf6 Re2 4. >>>> Rd8 Bh4 5. Rxf8+ Kxf8 6. Rd8+ Re8 7. >>>> Rxe8+ Qxe8 8. Bxh4 Qe3+ 9. Kb1 Qg1+ >>>> 10. Ka2 Qxg2 11. Qf4 Qxc2 12. Qxh6+ >>>> 15 51.44 -- 1. ... Kg8 >>>> 15 1:30 0.98 1. ... Kg8 2. Bxe5 Bf2 3. Rd4 Rxe5 >>>> 4. Qxe5 Re8 5. Rg4+ Qxg4 6. Qxe8+ Kg7 >>>> 7. Qe5+ f6 8. Qc7+ Kg6 9. Rd7 Qg5+ >>>> 10. Kb1 Bxg2 11. Rg7+ Kf5 12. Rxg5+ >>>> hxg5
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.