Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Distributed perft, current standings and trends

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 22:18:03 12/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2003 at 01:09:41, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>On December 12, 2003 at 23:31:41, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>On December 12, 2003 at 21:37:14, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>>
>>>On December 12, 2003 at 20:09:23, Slater Wold wrote:
>>>
>>>>On December 12, 2003 at 17:26:04, Aaron Gordon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I was wondering if it may be better to track the stats by trillions of moves
>>>>>done instead of on a block by block basis. Because the current way doesn't seem
>>>>>as if it'd be completely fair. For example.. lets say computer X is twice as
>>>>>fast as computer Y. However, computer Y completes two smaller blocks in the same
>>>>>time it takes computer X to do one. Now the stats report that computer Y has
>>>>>done two blocks, looking like it is twice as fast as computer X when actually
>>>>>the reverse is true. Just something to think about. Thanks for the project, I
>>>>>always love the distributed stuff. :)
>>>>
>>>>Good point.  My P4 2.0Ghz laptop worked on the same problem (set) for 6 hours...
>>>>
>>>>My P4 3.06Ghz finished one in 20 minutes.
>>>
>>>Seems my computers are getting the longer problems now.. that what you're
>>>seeing? Even with one of my 2.5's pulling 230,000knps I'm getting 3000-4000
>>>second (last one was 3460 seconds) blocks.
>>
>>Last problem:
>>
>>97096137599 nodes in 624.76 seconds (155412Knps).
>>
>>I was doing a bunch of other stuff while this one was running.  Probably would
>>have only taken 400s - 500s at full speed.
>
>Hmm.. bad luck for me then I guess. It's going full speed.. I'm just getting the
>HUGE blocks for some reason.

Cause you're the fastest!!  :)

Last problem - 209997536959 nodes in 1430.67 seconds (146782 KNPS)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.