Author: blass uri
Date: 03:53:16 11/21/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 1998 at 17:12:30, Amir Ban wrote: >On November 20, 1998 at 12:13:42, Tony Hedlund wrote: > >>>On November 19, 1998 at 15:39:27, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>>>On November 19, 1998 at 12:56:34, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>I found that in these games my Junior5 is faster than the Junior5 that played in >>>>the ssdf games(it can reach bigger depth in smaller times) >> >>Thanks for pointing this out. >> >>>>Rebel8(P90) won these 5 games 3:2 >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>Yes, I think this report is correct. >>> >>>It look like Junior was slowed down by a factor of 10 at least. It takes several >>>minutes to reach depths of 10 & 11 that if you replay those games it reaches in >>>seconds. >> >>Game 89 looks okay to me. Except for the first move out of book. >> > >So it seems > > >>>At the end of the 2nd game in this group (round "6" vs. Rebel8), in the drawn >>>K+B+P vs. K endgame, this takes extreme proportions: Junior several times plays >>>an "only move" that should take a few milliseconds, but instead this takes 8-9 >>>sec ! >>> >>>Junior5 node meter should show around 150 Knode/sec on this machine. This means >>>it went down to around 10 Knode/sec or even lower in these games. >>> >>>Tony, were those games played as a separate session ? Anything out of the >>>ordinary observed ? >> >>After I've played 11 games, Rebel8 was up 7-4 and had won the 3 last games. I >>quit Junior and realized that I had CB4 in the background. I then did the >>JuniorMark >>shorttest, with and without CB4. I got this numbers: >> >>with without >> >>42 (256,5s) 121 (90,6s) >>53 kN/s 151 kN/s >> >>I deleted games 9-11, as I is (was) sure that that was the last session, and >>replayed them. >>(Now games 89-91.) >> >>>Anyway, I suggest that if you start a match and you get a "non-Junior"-type >>>node/sec rate, to reboot the machine and try again. >> >>I'll certainly will do that. Is it okay with you if I delete games 85-88 and >>replay >>them? > >Yes > > >>How about Uri's suggestion not to use the Fritz5-CD? > >I think the autoplayer won't run without it. 1)I saw some games between nimzo3.5 and Junior5 when the Fritz5 CD was not used(game 8 and game 40). 2)comet32 did a horrible mistake in game 3872 of the ssdf games 4r3/8/5k2/5p2/8/3KP3/3N4/8 w - - 0 1 Comet32 played 105.Ne4+ and I guess that it is because of a bug about the 50 move rule(moves 57-104 were without capture or moving a pawn). I think that Comet32 may also lose game 50 of the new games of Junior5 Comet32 has KQP vs KQ but it can lose because of the bug. This game is the only game in the 100 games that maybe the CD rom of fritz5 is productive for Junior5(I do not know) I do not know if the tablebases are productive or not but I know that the CD rom of fritz5 is not part of the Junior5 program(if you buy only Junior5 without fritz5 then you do not get the tablebases) so I think that it is not fair to use the tablebases in the games of Junior5. Uri Uri > >Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.