Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:35:53 12/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2003 at 05:01:26, Dann Corbit wrote: >On December 13, 2003 at 04:31:15, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 12, 2003 at 20:43:25, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>In solving WAC at 5 seconds per position on a 950 MHz AMD Athlon machine, Crafty >>>solves 294 out of 300. That is pretty run of the mill as far as top engines go. >> >>No >> >>Knightdreamer is not a top engine and it solved 297/300 in 5 seconds in slower >>hardware(733 mhz PIII). > >And shredder 6 solves 285/300 on similar hardware. Shredder6 is an old version of shredder and shredder6 is weaker than a lot of free engines with this result. I guess that you can find more than 10 and probably even more than 20 free winboard engines that do better than shredder. I believe that my latest movei does better than shredder6 in that test but I need to look at my results that are at a different computer. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.