Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Distributed perft, current standings and trends

Author: Albert Bertilsson

Date: 06:19:42 12/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2003 at 04:45:02, Ingo Bauer wrote:

>Hi
>
>>Ordering by MNPS would be easier and actually favour those lucky enough to get
>>the large problems (large problems are searched faster because of the hash table
>>(specially for those with 512MB+ ht)).
>
>But then YOU have the problem that some will switch off their slower computers
>to maintain a high MNPS rate! Overall that would be slower for the project.
>
>Ingo

True, it would be really bad if several computers were turned off just to get
high stats. I have to think about this...

/Regards Albert



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.