Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 12:56:37 12/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On December 13, 2003 at 03:04:23, Albert Bertilsson wrote: >Your program actually seems a bit faster than mine. If perft(12) becomes real >would you consider letting the project use your exe? (It would only require a >known commandline interface). Sure I would. But I think, the honor belongs to Sharper! Also, before wasting lots of CPU time, I should review and test my perft code very carefully. The hash table stuff for perft is just a bit of an hack done in perhaps an hour without any good tests. Also, I changed my perft code to avoid many Incheck calls - so it is not a very simple 10 liner perft function anymore. With more possibilities for bugs ... I did not change the perft code to make perft faster, but rather to do something very similar, that the real search code does. Regards, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.