Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Technical question regarding interface for CCT

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 13:27:38 12/13/03

Go up one level in this thread


On December 13, 2003 at 14:54:08, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On December 13, 2003 at 13:44:20, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>
>>>What "official title"?  European World Computer Chess Champion?  CCT-6
>>>Computer Chess Champion?  ACM International Computer Chess Champion?
>>
>>World Computer Chess Champion.
>
>Nah. Call it the ICGA Champion, because that's what it is.
>
>I'd be interested to know what you think gives any organization the right to
>call the winner of their event the world champion. Is the winner of the NFL the
>world champion in American football? What about the winners of the NBA, the NHL,
>MLB? Are the winners of those leagues the world champions? Or are they the NFL
>Champions, etc.? What about the Olympics? What about the FIDE Champion?

The 'N' in NFL, NBA, NHL stands for 'national'. The 'I' in ICGA stands for
'international'.




>
>IMO, one important aspect is participants of a certain playing ability must be
>able to realistically participate if they desire to do so. The ICGA fails that
>requirement miserably, while leagues like the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB all pass with
>flying colors. They pay people a minimum of a few hundred thousand dollars per
>year to sit on the bench. If you could potentially be one of the best, and you
>have a desire to play in one of those leagues, someone will make sure you are
>participating, and you will be making many millions of dollars each year. I'm
>not sure if the FIDE passes here or not. I have a feeling if someone was as good
>as Kasparov or Kramnik, but didn't have the money required to participate in a
>"world championship" that someone would see that they got to participate, but
>maybe not.
>
>The CCTs pass the particpation requirement easily. The WCCC currently has the
>CCTs beat on the level of the very top participants, but that will change at
>some point.
>
>Personally, I think each organization should call their winner the Champion of
>that organization. IE ICGA Champion, FIDE Champion, CCT Champion, etc. Very few
>(if any) can undisputedly call their winner a world champion. Just call it what
>it is, and let people decide which organizations' champion is the most
>respected.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.